If a watch strap could tell its story, it would probably need a world map.
The leather may come from one region, the buckle from another, the packaging from a third, and the finished product may travel thousands of miles before reaching a customer's wrist.
For decades, globalization helped watch brands optimize costs by sourcing materials and manufacturing from around the world. But in 2026, the rules are changing.
Tariff adjustments, geopolitical tensions, shifting trade policies, shipping disruptions, and rising material costs are forcing brands to rethink how they build and manage their supply chains.
Today, the biggest challenge is no longer finding a supplier that can manufacture a quality product.
The challenge is finding a supplier that can continue delivering quality products when the world becomes unpredictable.
At SHX, we work with watch brands, distributors, wholesalers, and OEM partners across multiple international markets. Over the past several years, we have noticed a significant shift in buyer priorities.
Five years ago, the first question was usually:
"How much does it cost?"
Today, the question is increasingly:
"Can you still deliver if market conditions change?"
This case study explores how global tariffs and economic uncertainty are reshaping the watch and watch strap industry in 2026, and what brands can do to build more resilient supply chains.
![]()
For many years, procurement decisions followed a simple principle:
Find the lowest manufacturing cost.
The strategy worked well when international trade remained relatively stable.
However, recent years have introduced a different reality.
A tariff adjustment can increase import costs overnight.
A shipping disruption can delay inventory for weeks.
A geopolitical conflict can affect entire transportation routes.
Suddenly, the cheapest supplier may become the most expensive problem.
As a result, more brands are shifting their focus from cost optimization to risk management.
Modern procurement teams increasingly evaluate suppliers based on:
In 2026, resilience has become a competitive advantage.
![]()
Consumers see a watch strap as a single product.
Manufacturers see a network of interconnected supply chains.
A typical watch strap may involve:
Each component has its own sourcing risks.
When global trade conditions shift, even a minor disruption in one area can impact production schedules and delivery timelines.
This is why watch strap manufacturers are paying closer attention to supply chain diversification than ever before.
![]()
Over the past few years, FKM rubber straps have become increasingly popular among premium sports watch brands.
Compared with traditional silicone, FKM offers several advantages:
One example is the SHX ShadowGrain Matte FKM Strap, developed for demanding applications where durability and comfort are equally important.
Initially, demand for FKM products was driven primarily by sports and dive watch brands.
Today, we are seeing growing interest from independent watch companies and premium microbrands seeking to differentiate their product offerings.
However, from a procurement perspective, the discussion extends beyond product performance.
Buyers increasingly ask:
The lesson is simple.
A premium material only creates value if it can be supplied consistently.
This is where supply chain resilience becomes as important as product design.
![]()
Every few years, someone predicts the decline of leather watch straps.
Every few years, the market proves them wrong.
Despite the growth of rubber and technical materials, full-grain leather remains a cornerstone of the watch industry.
The SHX Smooth Full Grain Calfskin Strap is a good example.
While trends evolve, demand for high-quality leather straps remains remarkably stable.
Why?
Because consumers do not buy watches purely for function.
They also buy emotion.
Business meetings, formal events, weddings, and professional settings continue to favor the timeless appearance of leather.
From a manufacturing perspective, classic leather products offer another advantage:
Predictability.
Compared with emerging materials, established leather products benefit from:
This is why many successful watch brands maintain a balanced product strategy.
Innovation attracts attention.
Classic products generate stability.
Both are essential for sustainable growth.
![]()
In 2024, a North American independent watch brand approached SHX for support.
Due to confidentiality agreements, we will refer to the company as Brand A.
At the time, Brand A was experiencing rapid growth.
New product launches were selling well.
Marketing performance was strong.
Everything appeared to be moving in the right direction.
Then supply chain limitations emerged.
The brand relied heavily on a single supplier.
Average replenishment lead times exceeded 60 days.
Products sold out faster than inventory could be replaced.
The existing supplier specialized in only one material category.
As customer preferences diversified, the brand struggled to serve different market segments.
Some customers preferred FKM.
Others preferred leather.
Many wanted affordable silicone options.
With all production dependent on a single source, any disruption created immediate operational challenges.
![]()
After evaluating the situation, Brand A implemented a diversified sourcing strategy.
Its product portfolio was reorganized into three categories:
FKM rubber straps targeting sports and dive watch customers.
Full-grain leather straps serving professional and formal wear segments.
High-quality silicone straps designed for broad consumer appeal.
Within twelve months:
Most importantly, future growth was no longer constrained by a single supply chain bottleneck.
Brands are reducing dependence on single-source suppliers.
Redundancy is becoming a strategic asset.
Procurement teams increasingly forecast six to twelve months ahead rather than relying on short-term purchasing cycles.
Many companies are maintaining safety stock to protect against unexpected disruptions.
Procurement decisions are increasingly based on stability, communication, and long-term performance rather than price alone.
Watch brands should ask themselves:
If three or more answers are yes, the supply chain may be carrying significant operational risk.
Brands will increasingly demand visibility into sourcing, manufacturing, and quality control processes.
More companies will adopt multi-region production and sourcing strategies to reduce exposure to geopolitical risks.
Reliable quality, predictable lead times, and supply chain resilience will become more important than marginal price differences.
For much of the past decade, competition in the watch industry focused on design, branding, and marketing.
Over the next decade, supply chain resilience will become equally important.
Tariffs will change.
Trade policies will evolve.
Consumer demand will shift.
But one principle remains constant:
Strong brands are built on reliable supply chains.
Customers may buy a watch strap because it looks good.
They return because it is available when they need it.
In an increasingly uncertain world, reliability has become part of the product itself.
And that may be the most important lesson the watch industry can learn in 2026.